prodigious reader, chronic forgetter
4454 stories
·
14 followers

How Hard Is It To Oppose Murder?

1 Comment

By now you've almost certainly seen the video for yourself, or read about it: an ICE agent shooting a Minneapolis woman, Renee Nicole Good, in the head from point-blank range, killing her as she attempted to drive away from the scene of an immigration sting where protesters had gathered on Wednesday. The agent's actions, caught from several angles on video now widely available across all forms of visual media, are indefensible. By any human standard the shooting is a murder, made all the more appalling by the Trump administration's rush to exonerate the murderer with obvious lies, and paint the victim, an unarmed U.S. citizen guilty of nothing more than perhaps having panicked when masked agents surrounded her car and tried to yank her out of it, as a terrorist and would-be killer.

The murder and the response seem to have shocked the nation; they've even largely driven Trump's unlawful invasion of Venezuela and kidnapping of its president down the figurative and physical page. Here is what Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar has to say about it:



Read the whole story
rocketo
4 hours ago
reply
"Why does the mainstream Democratic response to authoritarian violence always have to be abstracted like this? What would it take for these freaks to voice objection to the actual fact of state terror happening right in front of their faces, rather than raising limp procedural qualms over Trump not having filed the proper paperwork to inflict it with sufficient bipartisanship?"
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete

I Need to Get Something Off My Chest

1 Comment

Exactly one year ago, I profiled Junko Kazukawa, a 61-year-old ultrarunner who, like me, had earned a spot in the 2025 Hardrock Hundred after a decade in the lottery. A breast cancer survivor who had a double mastectomy, I asked if she had reconstructive surgery with implants or stayed flat. She answered: “Flat, 100 percent. ... As a runner, I don’t want anything bouncing around. I never had big breasts, but just enough to annoy me when running. The doctor also told me that if I got [implants], I’d have to replace them in 10 to 20 years, and I don’t want surgery again.”

Junko opened my mind and inspired me not only with her dedication to her sport, but also with her commitment to be true to herself and to do what felt right for her, rather than adhering to society’s norms and beauty standards.

I offer the following essay in the same spirit: hoping to inspire other women to be true to themselves and accept their bodies as-is. I hope you might share it with other women you know who face breast surgery because they have old implants that need replacement or removal, or they face mastectomy, or they’re considering augmentation—or they simply but deeply struggle with body image.

For 22 years, I ran around with small bags of saline water on my chest. I told only a handful of my closest friends, because I felt ashamed about artificial enhancement, which is antithetical to my all-natural and athletic aesthetic.

Now those bags are gone, since I had explant surgery (i.e. implant removal without replacement) December 1, and I decided to share my secret here because I hope more women will know about the risks and consequences of implants and the benefits of staying flat.

I hope more women will ask—as I’m asking internally—why the hell do we do this to ourselves? Who are we trying to please, and why?

In early 2004, when I was 34, I went to a plastic surgeon and told her, “I want runner boobs. Like, ballerina boobs”—meaning, I wanted augmentation that looked natural and fit my body. “I want the world’s smallest boob job.” And I got it.

Gremlins of insecurities skewed my thoughts and actions during that period of time. My little A-cup breasts had risen to the occasion to nurse my two babies from 1998 through 2002, and after weaning, they literally vanished, as if my body absorbed every cell of breast tissue. I became flatter than my husband. My fit-runner physique developed a masculine chest with a texture that made me think of beef jerky.

Two shots from late 2003 and early '04, shortly before I had surgery, showing the flat me. In the left I'm with my wonderful first coach, and in the right I'm racing and winning a 5K.
About a year and a half after the surgery.

Meanwhile, I was working to rebuild my marriage. I had fallen prey to another man’s flattery after he plugged into my lifelong needs for attention, validation, and reassurance that I’m attractive. I had been conditioned early in life, by the culture of the time and by parents who casually commented on “good tits,” to please men sexually. And my ego was at a low point as a stay-at-home mom with a shelved career.

Suffice to say, 34-year-old me wasn’t in a good headspace. I needed counseling more than cosmetic surgery.

My tenderhearted, respectful husband never suggested that I refill my flat chest, though he wasn’t opposed to the idea; he liked the way B cups would look. It was my decision entirely but influenced by a desire to please him since I had hurt him. I wanted to look feminine for him, because he had fallen in love with a curvy party girl (the pre-runner version of me), not a ripped runner.

My self-confidence had become as deflated as my post-nursing breasts. I framed and justified my decision as reconstruction, not augmentation.

When I got it done, I gave virtually no thought to the surgeon’s admonishment that they’d need replacement in 15 or so years. That time frame seemed way, way far off in the future.

This is what I would tell the 34-year-old me, or anyone considering implants for augmentation or for mastectomy reconstruction:

There’s a good chance your implants will harden over time and feel like hockey pucks, making them rise up and look extra fake with their firmness, and making it uncomfortable to sleep on your stomach. This is called capsular contracture, and I developed it on one side badly and on the other side mildly.

There’s a good chance you’ll lose sensitivity on and around one or both nipples. Yep, I checked that box.

According to testimonials from countless women, but not proven definitively, implants can trigger Breast Implant Illness (BII), an umbrella term for an array of symptoms such as joint pain and autoimmune reactions such as rashes. I elected to get saline rather than silicone implants, which are safer insofar as if they rupture, the body will harmlessly absorb the fluid. But saline implants are encased in a silicone shell, and both types can cause infections and other complications. (Thankfully, I never had BII symptoms.)

Not always but in some cases, implants can interfere with breastfeeding, especially if placed over the muscle, where they can compress milk ducts.

Implants make it harder to get and read a mammogram. Mammography technologists have a work-around, but it’s not perfect, and it compounds the difficulty of detecting tumors in dense breast tissue (which many small-breasted women have). I also suspect—without evidence but based on my experience—that implants may make women less inclined to get routine mammograms. I admittedly avoided mammograms because the process is extra uncomfortable with implants, and I worried the machine might rupture them, which is very rare but not impossible. Psychologically, I didn’t want to fess up to my implants. Even with my medical providers, I felt shame because I was a secret phony who hypocritically advocated authenticity.

Explant surgery (removal without replacement) likely will leave your chest looking altered, even damaged, rather than merely returning it to its pre-surgery appearance of small-breasted or flat. You’ll have smiley-shaped scars, and your breasts may look concave or dimpled in areas because the implant no longer fills out that space. To improve this outcome, some larger-breasted women may opt for a breast lift (removing excess skin to tighten tissue) or a more comprehensive aesthetic flat closure to reshape the chest wall to be flat and smooth. Some may also get a fat transfer (liposuction from one area to inject fat cells in the chest, which is a milder form of augmentation than implants; liposuction can be painful and cause complications). I did not get any of this extra work done because I’m so flat, I don’t have much sag to fill or tissue to sculpt, and I wanted the surgery to be as uncomplicated and low risk as possible.

Our society has normalized cosmetic surgery, but the surgery is significant and, in my view, pretty freaking gruesome and expensive. My bilateral explant with capsulectomy (removal of the scar tissue around the implant) cost $5617 not covered by insurance, and it would’ve been $8403 if I had opted for an exchange (new implants put in). Long plastic tubes with grenade-shaped bulbs exited my rib cage and drained bloody fluid for two weeks, which severely limited movement, disrupted sleep, and made it awkward to be in public (I wore oversized sweaters to hide them). I was instructed to maintain “T-rex arms” with upper arms kept near my sides, and no heavy lifting or reaching, for four weeks, along with no high-impact activity or anything that would significantly raise my heart rate, because high blood flow could trigger blood pooling and harm healing at the surgery site. (I cheated and restarted a small amount of running after three weeks, because my chest felt OK). No push-up or chest-press exercises for longer.

Me post-op in early December.

Going flat and staying that way IS an option. If you have a mastectomy, you don’t need reconstruction, even though your doctors may assume that’s what you want and talk about it as if it’s a given. I understand and respect breast cancer survivors who opt for reconstruction; I’m just saying, I hope they’ll consider the alternative as realistic, not radical.

If your breasts shrink after breastfeeding, then you are normal and blessed that they did their job of feeding your babies.

If you get implants and later choose “exchange” rather than “removal,” you’ll face all this surgery and recovery again when the implants reach the end of their lifespan. No thank you!

Mostly, you are fine as is! If you’re feeling down on yourself, you may need to work on your head and heart more than your outward appearance.

Let’s spend time on that last point, because I continue to struggle with self-acceptance and to push back against peer and societal pressure to conform to beauty standards.

Family fun in Las Vegas circa 1976.

Let’s briefly detour to my childhood to marvel at this gem of a photo, which captures the ethos and culture of my 1970s upbringing with bawdy parents. Our family made annual pilgrimages to Vegas, since my dad was a skilled gambler, and my sibs and I took this photo at a casino with this cutout caricature.

I’m the little girl, age 7 if I recall correctly, on the left. My parents thought it was hilarious (and I can’t help but laugh now, too, even as I wince at how the photo evokes material from the Epstein files). A poster-sized blowup of this photo hung in my childhood bedroom for years, subconsciously shaping my view of women’s roles and bodies even more than the ubiquitous Farrah Fawcett red swimsuit pinup. I also daily viewed a ceramic mug on my dad’s bureau shaped as a woman’s large, bare upturned breast (which he used to hold spare change and golf tees).

For these reasons and others, I grew up thinking that well-shaped breasts with cleavage mattered as much as smooth feathered hair, and puberty gave me neither.

As an adult, I have said “no” to the epidemic of Botox-frozen foreheads, brow lifts, and lip injections. I can’t stomach the cost when I think of the more worthwhile things the money could buy, and I want to role model aging naturally for my daughter and her peers. Plus, lifts and injections are a slippery slope, and the more you do, the more hooked you become on misbelieving you need to “get back” to your younger appearance and preserve it rather than embracing the age you are and celebrating the fact that aging equals living.

But let’s face it, being as flat as a door isn’t easy when nearly every female celebrity who is celebrated as attractive is thin, smooth-skinned, and has two well-rounded mounds on her chest—a nearly impossible combo naturally—thanks to cosmetic treatments and implants.

The pressure hits female athletes when role models like Olympic gymnast Simone Biles has multiple cosmetic enhancements, including an obvious breast augmentation, which to me is incredibly sad—as if being the most successful gymnast ever, earning seven gold medals, isn’t enough to feel good about her body. She was beautiful and admirable as her “before” self and looks artificial now.

The before and after of Simone Biles from People magazine.

Where does it stop? You get a boob job, a straight thin nose, an eyebrow lift, and/or cheekbone or jaw implants only to focus on your saggy neck, or your flat or too-large butt, and obsess about “fixing” them too.

“This past year, [cosmetic] surgery crossed the Rubicon,” writes Vanity Fair writer Marisa Meltzer, who covers the fashion and beauty industries, in an excellent essay in the New York Times. “Many famous people who are getting work done do not necessarily look like a younger version of themselves anymore; they simply look expensive. ‘Uncanny’ is an overused word these days, but it’s a good way of describing the inhuman artifice of the prevailing plastic surgery tends. … We are now at a point where forgoing cosmetic procedures is almost remarkable.” (emphasis added)

I’d like to be remarkable in that way. And you know what? It feels easier to give the finger to appearance expectations as I age. At long last, I’m letting go, bit by bit, of caring about being attractive in the eyes of others. I feel more secure in my peer group, community, and body in my mid-fifties than early forties. The rebel in me shouts fuck this! I am not playing that game of pleasing anyone else, trying to look like anyone else, or needing anyone’s admiration anymore.

It also helps to learn that I am part of a growing trend, which emboldens me to speak out as I’m doing here. My plastic surgeon told me he’s doing more explant surgeries because more women are choosing to look flatter and natural. His observation is backed up by studies like this and this about plastic surgeons seeing an uptick in explant surgery, and testimonials like this on TikTok by influencers talking about why they’re removing their implants.

I’m motivated to walk with good posture, shoulders back, and not hide the level surface of my chest. Inwardly I wince when I examine the flatness while undressed and view the scars and a slight indentation. So I close my eyes and remind myself that I feel better. I feel more aerodynamic and boyish when I run. I feel comfortable when I lie on my stomach to sleep. I feel strong and, regardless of what the mirror shows, youthful!

I was at my Berkeley OBGYN’s office in 2002, the year I stopped nursing my son, when I shyly and cautiously asked my doctor what she thought of breast implants. Her reply stuck with me.

She was a graying feminist who remembered life before Roe. “What do I think of it?” she asked rhetorically, her voice ratcheting up a level. “I think it’s self-mutilation!”

Her reply—which promptly ended our conversation—stung and fed my need for secrecy when I got mine done. For years, I resented her judgmental and insensitive comment, because she missed an opportunity to query with compassion and curiosity about why I asked about it and perhaps to steer me toward therapy.

Now, however, having read many articles about cosmetic surgery’s spread to younger ages and to more body parts (like this, “Plastic Surgery Comes for the Waist,” about ribcage alteration to make Barbie-like corseted waistlines) and the horrifying homogenization of “Mar-A-Lago Face,” and having chosen to cut open my body to reshape it and suffered the shitty aftermath of recovery and scars, I look back on my granola doc’s declaration and think, you know, she had a point.

I’ll leave you with this recent poem by Rosemerry Wahtola Trommer, which spoke to me—actually, made me cry—its title capturing the long road to liberation and self-love the way you are.

But Not a Moment Sooner

Eventually we learn to laugh when we drop
the glass and it shatters all over the floor,
finding laughter more fun than a shackle of curses.
We can wiggle our butt more when someone
says it looks big instead of trying to tuck it
tighter beneath our hips. Eventually we learn
there is no way to not be exactly ourselves.
What freedom then. We can listen to the sound
of our own voice without cringing. Can dance
in front of anyone. Can wake up grateful for our aging face
in the mirror. Can wear questions like exotic perfume
and see how they grow us. Eventually,
we can look at each other and say,
I’m so glad you are exactly who you are.

Me now. That's all, folks!

If this story resonated with you, I hope you’ll share it, and I invite you to read these two posts from the past year that touch on similar themes.

On fitting in, feeling ugly or pretty, the sexualization of young women, and why dressing up triggers me:

On how “wellness” has become a repackaging of the beauty and diet industries pushing unproven products and heightening women’s insecurities in the name of “self-care”:

Thank you for reading this far, and happy new year! If you’d like to support this newsletter but would rather not commit to a paid subscription, I have a virtual tip jar if you’d like to make a small donation.

Buy Me a Coffee virtual tip jar

Read the whole story
rocketo
4 hours ago
reply
But Not a Moment Sooner

Eventually we learn to laugh when we drop
the glass and it shatters all over the floor,
finding laughter more fun than a shackle of curses.
We can wiggle our butt more when someone
says it looks big instead of trying to tuck it
tighter beneath our hips. Eventually we learn
there is no way to not be exactly ourselves.
What freedom then. We can listen to the sound
of our own voice without cringing. Can dance
in front of anyone. Can wake up grateful for our aging face
in the mirror. Can wear questions like exotic perfume
and see how they grow us. Eventually,
we can look at each other and say,
I’m so glad you are exactly who you are.
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete

ICE Is Modeling Its Brutality After The IDF

1 Comment

Call it recency bias, personal interest, or perhaps just a general concern for society's trajectory right now, but as I followed Wednesday's news of an ICE agent killing 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis, then watched the federal government flatly lie about the sequence of events, the indignant language and informational smokescreens felt nauseatingly familiar. It was as if someone had taken Israel's playbook for Gaza and tested it out stateside.

You don't have to leave the city, much less the state or country, to find precedent of law enforcement slaughtering the people they're supposed to protect. It's an American tradition already illustrated by many devastated families and callous police union presidents. But for years now, both in Gaza and the West Bank, the Israeli government has modeled how to act with both viciousness and total impunity. That in turn has affected the efficacy of public pressure in other parts of the world. Entities within the sphere of U.S. power have realized that it is even easier to slaughter a person in the street and get away with it.



Read the whole story
rocketo
4 hours ago
reply
israel has long been the testing ground for warfare against the people (undesirable according to the state) who live there
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete

Living with the lies

1 Share
Landscape

John Ganz notes something I found particularly resonant:

“Kołakowski wrote in The Eclipse of Ideology, ‘It is perhaps the most oppressive part of life under communism. Not terror, not exploitation, but the all-pervading lie, felt by everybody, known to everybody. It is something which makes life intolerable.’”

I don’t know about you, but I find the endless lies and lying often to be the most infuriating and demoralizing part of the present situation. In the wake of this terrible killing in Minneapolis, my first thought, after the initial shock, anger, and sadness, was the knowledge that the next few days, months, weeks, and years would be filled with endless lying about what happened on the part of the regime and its stooges. This filled me, if not quite with despair, then at least with a strong sense of depression. I suppose it has something to do with my vocation as a historian, where I can accept tragedy and even evil as unavoidable parts of the human experience, so long as witness can be borne and the truth eventually discovered.

It doesn’t help that I spend much of my time on a website dedicated to the destruction of truth and the dissemination of propaganda: Twitter or Elon Musk’s X. I do this for my work and to try to push back in my small way against that noxious climate, but I generally don’t recommend it. There is an unavoidable mental distortion that takes place in its topsy-turvy world: you either begin to accept the lies or, if you retain your moral center, you begin to believe that a critical mass or even majority of others have, and therefore you exist as an isolated or minor part of society. The result is demoralization. I liken being on there to working with radioactive or toxic waste, and I recommend people who don’t need to do it professionally to avoid it.

I don’t do any social media as conventionally defined for this very reason, although LGM itself can be seen as a type of social media under a more expansive definition. And one reason I continue to write here is something else Ganz says about our present circumstances:

You go along to get along. You pretend that fake statistics are real and fake elections are real. Everyone does it, and so you think fewer and fewer people are dissatisfied with the state of things. Again, Havel was operating in a context that was far more restrictive and oppressive than anything we are experiencing here and had taken on a certain regularity and automatism. In other words, it was a self-sustaining system. What we have here is not a system, but the effort to create one. But many people in the US are already living in the lie and are encouraging others to do so. The administration comes up with totally absurd lies; they are obscene and preposterous. They issue outlandish statements and parade their clownish idiots on TV, but what I find much more insidious and insulting is the demand on the part of some that we take them seriously or pretend that they are a government like any other. This is presented as truth, objectivity, or fairness, but it is its ultimate destruction. For instance, this is what I believed was going on with Bari Weiss’s memo. It struck me as the beginning of a system of apparatchiks who produce legitimating propaganda for a regime that openly mocks the truth. Such people can flatter themselves that they are independent and not members of “the Party,” so to speak, but they are living in a lie. They are pretending that there’s something more than issuing from the mouths of authority than obscenities and lies. I, for one, won’t play along with this stupid ritual. It poses as civility but is in reality the death of civic life.

Another thing that stuck with me from that post was this passage:

Kołakowski was aware that a characteristic of monopolistic power was the continued effort to atomize society and destroy all forms of social life not prescribed by the ruling apparat. Thus he proposed that even the ‘most innocent forms of social organisation can … become transformed into centres of opposition’[26]. Therefore constant pressure, rather than armed conflict, in the form of persistent dissidence and self-organised social groups, had the potential to build the independent sphere, creating the ‘snowball’ phenomenon which could threaten the whole political order[27].

Kołakowski’s strategy is similar to that later presented by Václav Havel in The Power of the Powerless (1978). Havel stated that the oppressed always contain ‘within themselves the power to remedy their own powerlessness’[28], and encouraged individuals to ‘live in truth’, to go about their daily activities as if communism did not exist, such as organising small book clubs or sports teams.

This is quite similar to Alexis de Tocqueville’s accounts in Democracy in America of the important role that “voluntary associations” have in American democracy:

As soon as some inhabitants of the United States have conceived of a sentiment or an idea that they want to bring about in the world, they seek each other out, and when they have found each other, they unite. From that moment, they are no longer isolated men, but a power that is seen from afar, and whose actions serve as an example; a power that speaks and to which you listen.

This is why I always thought the mockery and criticism of BlueSky or the No Kings Protests were wrongheaded at best and could be actually harmful. Whatever else you may say about them, they are other spaces, notdominated by the lies of the regime and its supporters. They let people know who don’t agree that they are not “isolated men,” but a “power that is seen from afar.” This is just basic civics. But I digress. I guess what I’m saying, for myself as much as anyone else, is that it’s important both one’s soul and sanity, as well as one’s politics, not to live solely among the lies.

Among many other things very badly need to happen, Elon Musk ought to be denaturalized, deported, and expropriated of any property within the legal reach of the United States government (Musk’s summary of the Minneapolis incident — not linking — was “she was trying to run people over.”). Six members of the SCOTUS need to be impeached, convicted, and then have their various financial and other dealings investigated vigorously. Stephen Miller needs to be sent to Gitmo pending a laborious investigation into his connections to domestic and international terrorism. I realize these things and many others like them are currently impossible, but that doesn’t make them any less necessary. The first step is, truly recognizing that necessity.

The “prosecute the former regime at every level” candidate has my vote in 2028.

Ken Jennings (@kenjennings.bsky.social) 2026-01-07T20:26:57.821Z

This is the way.

The post Living with the lies appeared first on Lawyers, Guns & Money.

Read the whole story
rocketo
4 hours ago
reply
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete

When Everyday Life Becomes Domestic Terrorism

1 Share

People are back out on the streets of Minneapolis again, they are barricading the roads and tending curbside memorials, they are asking for someone to make sense of a reckless and unnecessary death at the hands of law enforcement.

On Wednesday, Renee Macklin Good was shot and killed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer while driving her SUV on the city's southside. Good was stopped in the middle of the road as ICE agents approached from all sides. The shooter had his phone out, and agents seemed to be bellowing contradictory instructions while another brazenly attempted to pull her out of a moving vehicle. She slowly backed away, then attempted to drive off before several shots were fired. Good's SUV rolled down the street before colliding with a utility pole; the agent that pulled the trigger was driven away from the scene, and agents that remained reportedly prevented a bystander who identified himself as a physician from attempting to save Good's life. She died less than a mile from the spot where George Floyd was murdered by Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin in 2020.



Read the whole story
rocketo
5 hours ago
reply
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete

ICE’s Killing of Renee Good Is Part of a Bigger Project

1 Share
The right is waging, and winning, a war on empathy. The country is poorer, and more dangerous, for it.

Read the whole story
rocketo
5 hours ago
reply
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories