Massive club owners Kevin Kauer and Ethan Cory were in the middle of doing a supply run for a party on October 22 when Cory received a concerning text from their social media manager. Instagram had suspended the gay club’s account–which boasts around 22,500 followers—without much explanation. 

According to Kauer and Cory, the so-called “final straw” for Meta—the Mark Zuckerberg–headed company that owns Instagram—appeared to be Massive’s promotion of Pack Party, a monthly party for Seattle transmascs. The club co-owners said Meta’s AI detection flagged the posts for “conditioning harm” to other people and took down all accounts involved: Massive, Pack Party, and the account belonging to bar manager and Pack Party organizer Max Currie. No one received any further details on what happened and why. 

“All they told us was two words: ‘conditioning harm.’ That’s it,” says Cory. “The issue with Meta is that you don’t clearly understand what the rules are. So, if we were to do anything wrong—and nothing we’re doing is wrong—there’s no way to actually amend your actions without going through their AI review.” 

The suspension and deletion of Massive, Pack Party, and Currie’s accounts are part of a concerning pattern of gay clubs and promoters across the country being targeted by Meta’s AI detection system. Meta could not be reached for comment on Massive’s Instagram suspension.  

Gay clubs exist as spaces for queer people to dance, sip a drink, and meet up with other people in their community, things everyone has a right to do. For a club like Massive, not having access to a platform where they can promote their parties and events to followers means smaller turnouts, directly affecting their bottom line in a business where margins are already small. The suspension of their Instagram last month forced Massive to cancel Bronze Babez, a drag-pole-burlesque show featuring Black and Brown performers. 

“We can’t get promotion out, and it means that a whole group of people are now out of a paycheck as well,” says Cory. “It affects more than just our engagement and selling tickets. It means losing a space for a lot of people to just be themselves, for one, and also make money and survive in Seattle, which is obviously a very insanely expensive city.”

Kauer and Cory immediately took to their personal Instagrams, alerting the community about the accounts’ suspension, urging any queers who had an inside track at Meta to help them with the situation. In the past, according to Kauer (who has worked in queer nightlife for two decades), public pressure was the surest way to get accounts back. But as Meta increasingly relies on automated technology to monitor their platforms, it makes it seemingly impossible for suspended accounts to make their case to an actual human without a sympathetic party on the inside. 

“You’re not really given the option to ever get justice on it unless you make some huge deal of it, which is super unfair, particularly if a person that’s being affected doesn’t have some large community or business or people behind them to help them out,” says Kauer. “You’re just kind of screwed.”

A few days of back-channeling later, Massive’s Instagram account was restored, only for Massive’s Stripe account—which processes credit card payments on the club’s ticketing site—to then be taken down. The company flagged Massive event descriptions containing the terms “slutty bingo” and “pole dancers.” As they worked with their ticketing company, Tixr, to get their Stripe account back up and running ahead of Massive’s packed Halloweekend event schedule, their Instagram was taken down— again. 

“Obviously a human reviewed our things and got [Massive’s Instagram] back. Was it then automatically reported again by the automations? Or did some other human come in and say, ‘No, that’s not OK?’” says Kauer. “We follow the rules the best we can.”

A similar sense of frustration overcame Max Currie, who started the monthly Pack Party at Massive in April 2025 as a way for people under the transmasc umbrella to meet one another, make friends, dance, and find partners in love.

Meta labeling his party as “conditioning harm” is completely against the party’s ethos. “If anything, it’s the opposite,” says Currie. “These events are oftentimes how we can help stop harm in our community, just having a place to go and be around other people who have shared life experiences.” He immediately appealed Meta’s ruling and, three days later, discovered both his personal and Pack Party accounts had been fully deleted. Though Currie still plans on hosting the party every second Thursday at Massive, there’s no clear path forward.

“I’m at a standstill,” he says. “How do I even reach my community without being able to be on social media? How do I promote this event, how do I talk to people about their experiences at the party? It’s been pretty rough.”

This patterned targeting of queer clubs, bars, and promoters isn’t new. According to a Facebook post, CC’s Seattle had their Instagram account suspended in April and denied their appeal for reinstatement. When a bar worker continued to promote CC’s events, their account got suspended as well. As a result, CC’s has been forced to move off of Instagram and mainly posts updates on Bluesky and their website. 

Nationally, Meta suspended the Instagram account of historic San Francisco gay bar the Stud in July, falsely flagging it for “engaging in human trafficking.” Only after intense pressure from the public and state senators did the Stud get its account back. In the last year, similar Meta suspensions have hit trans-focused club night Transfix and clubs Catch One, Club Chico, and Club Tempo in Los Angeles, gay bar Rain on 4th in Austin, and Latino gay clubs Next Level and Que Rico in Oakland. 

It’s a tricky balancing act for gay bars and promoters. They have to navigate the ever-shifting sensibilities of a large social media platform that is seemingly hostile to their existence, while running a business based on attention. Kauer and Cory say they have had to be extra judicious about what they post on Massive’s Instagram page, nixing party pictures that might have an errant exposed torso or using codes for words like “trans” or “queer”  that could set off Meta’s detection system. 

“For us to advertise and put our business out in queer nightlife… and make it through the Instagram barriers is a real huge effort,” says Kauer. “And they keep taking you down, or people can report you. It just makes it quite a hellscape, to be honest.”

While Massive got their Stripe account back up before Halloween, their Instagram account is still suspended. The account’s suspension is making Kauer and Cory rethink the club’s entire marketing strategy and consider moving things like ticketing and promoting offline entirely. Currently, the best way to find out about goings-on at Massive is to subscribe to their weekly email newsletter. Though they currently have 15,000 subscribers, Kauer says the email “open” rate sits at around 8 percent. 

For better or worse, social media platforms like Instagram are the de facto way to get word out about parties, DJ nights, and drag shows they host each week. Not having it hurts attendance, which, in turn, affects their ability to keep the bar above water. But being on a platform like Instagram or Facebook puts gay bars like theirs in a position that’s beholden to the whims of Meta’s technology. 

“Massive is like many businesses that, unfortunately, rely heavily on Instagram. We’ve worked really hard this whole time to build it naturally and to make it fun and engaging and work for our club while still following their rules,” says Kauer. “Then to take it away, I mean, they’re just dinging a small business that’s already fighting to survive.”

The post Meta Keeps Suspending Seattle Bars and Clubs from Instagram appeared first on The Stranger.

Elisabetta Palagi, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Pisa, had sent her team of research students to Ethiopia to study geladas, monkeys whose hearts appear to gleam out of their chests. But as her students watched the geladas munch on a grassy plateau alongside other grazing animals, they noticed a peculiar interaction between two other animals. A bull approached a male donkey and mounted him. This behavior did not seem to bother the donkey. The donkey did not kick him or otherwise try to escape the interaction. The researchers contacted Palagi and asked if she thought this cross-species intercourse was worth studying. "I said yes," Palagi wrote in an email.

After close observation, the researchers found that the the bull, dubbed Achille, and the donkey, dubbed Patroclo, have a persistent, mutual sexual relationship, which is described in a new paper in Current Biology. Achille and Patroclo's relationship was not news to the local herders, who laughed when they saw the researchers filming the unexpected pair. "What was an unexpected observation for us was evidently a familiar sight to them," Palagi said. (The paper includes explicit footage of the pair's mating that we have omitted out of respect for their privacy.)

thefugitivesaint:

Sir Patrick Stewart (1940-2026)

(Image: Community Lunch on Capitol Hill)

(Image: Community Lunch on Capitol Hill)

By Brenna Gauchat
On a Monday morning, you can stop by Community Lunch on Capitol Hill’s breakfast service for a hot coffee and pastry, then return later for lunch and dinner leftovers. Operating out of All Pilgrims Christian Church, the Capitol Hill-based nonprofit is a non-religious meal service dedicated to serving free, high-quality food every weekday to over 100 guests daily. According to Paul Getzel, the nonprofit’s executive director, the program is on track to serve 120,000 meals this year, including 1,000 plates for Thanksgiving and December holidays. As of August, meal distribution is up 40% year-over-year — a trend Getzel expects to continue.

Getzel attributes this growth to the program’s “barrierless” model, which sets Community Lunch apart from other meal services. Because guests may take unlimited food, the count of meals distributed often outnumbers individuals served, as guests frequently share extra plates with others or save them for later. “What [the meals distributed count] indicates to me is that a lot of people are still representing other people that are outside,” Getzel said about stepping back when someone asks for multiple meals. “Sometimes, when I go out to sort of clean up around the church here, I see folks bringing food to their friends who didn’t come in. They’re just out there for a lot of reasons.” Guests are never asked for identification or names, ensuring access regardless of circumstances.

With many regular guests, staff and volunteers naturally build relationships and rapport over time. “I see some folks that I know that are unhoused, that every day, every minute, every night are living in survival circumstances,” Getzel said, emphasizing the focus on immediate essentials—food, water, clothing, and health services—rather than long-term systemic issues. “What we provide is, at least, some safety and some service and deference. And hopefully some comfort for them. An hour and a half a day for lunch, a little bit longer on the holidays.”

Getzel noted that building neighborhood trust through reliable food access also opens doors for external referrals. “I think one thing that has always really inspired me is when you connect with somebody around their basic needs or on food,” Getzel said. “It’s apt to take a referral to another service, just because you have built that trust with people.”

Beyond meals, Community Lunch distributes clothing and health items such as Naloxone and Plan B. The program also partners with Seattle King County Public Health’s Street Medicine team to provide mobile medical care on site, enabling staff to connect guests needing medical attention directly with trusted providers.

“That warm handoff is really, really helpful with [referrals to external care],” Getzel said. “Based on that relationship, they’re willing to accept care.” Looking ahead, the nonprofit is exploring expansions into low-cost veterinary care and legal or immigration advocacy with groups like Northwest Immigrant Rights Project. “I think one thing that we’re really trying to do this year is be responsive to community need,” Getzel said.

Getzel brings over 25 years of local nonprofit experience to Community Lunch, having previously spent nearly 18 years at Lifelong, including work with its Chicken Soup Brigade food and nutrition program. Now focusing on funding, volunteer recruitment, and holiday prep, Getzel ensures Community Lunch remains open during holidays when other services close. “Need doesn’t stop just because it’s the holidays,” Getzel said. “Assuming that the weather is a little bit nasty by then, we want to make sure, for the holidays, people could get out of the weather at least for a little while.”

Getzel

While partially funded by city grants, the organization relies primarily on donations to cover expenses. Working with partners like Food Lifeline, the kitchen prepares high-quality holiday meals and requests community support through food and monetary contributions. “We really try to provide an experience where we’re deferring to our guests and we’re serving them because a lot of these folks just don’t experience that ever,” Getzel said. “We don’t want to compromise because we don’t have something for free.”

Supported by six staff members and about 100 weekly volunteers, the program needs consistent volunteer help during holiday meal prep. While Thanksgiving Day sees an influx of volunteers, help is especially needed in the days leading up to the holidays for food preparation. Getzel encourages community members to volunteer with friends and family during the season. “We want everybody,” Getzel said. “We really want to have diversity in every sense of the word, including income and neighborhood you live in, age, everything.”

The lunches also bring together people who want to help. CHS reported here on Community Lunch volunteers who are hoping to inspire the creation of a new “day shelter” facility on Capitol Hill.

At its core, Community Lunch prides itself on offering meals, companionship, shelter, and dignity to the neighborhood. “I just urge for people to not lose their compassion for everybody,” Getzel said. “When we shut ourselves down and dismiss somebody and dehumanize somebody, that’s not going to be a solution. That person’s not going anywhere, and they’re just going to suffer more.”

For more information on how to help, visit communitylunch.org.

• Breakfast: Monday–Friday, 9:00 AM – 10:00 AM
• Lunch & Leftovers: Monday–Friday, 12:00 PM – 1:30 PM
• Holidays: Open Thanksgiving Day and December holidays with extended daytime service.
• No ID, registration, or proof of need required.

• Holiday Kitchen Prep: Shifts on the Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday leading into Thanksgiving and Christmas (highest priority).
• Meal Service & Cleanup: Weekday lunch shifts and limited holiday-day slots.
• Sign-ups available at communitylunch.org.

• Monetary Gifts: Supports bulk ingredient sourcing with partners like Food Lifeline.
• Winter Supplies: Warm coats, gloves, beanies, wool socks, and blankets.
• Health & Hygiene: Unopened travel toiletries, Naloxone, and basic health supplies.

$5 A MONTH TO HELP KEEP CHS PAYWALL-FREE

Subscribe to CHS to help hire writers and photographers to cover the neighborhood. CHS is a pay what you can community news site with no required sign-in or paywall. To stay that way, we need you. Become a subscriber to help us cover the neighborhood for $5 a month -- or choose your level of support

Spoiler Alert: While I won’t be giving away the entirety of You Can See Everything, I will have to discuss some important aspects of the film in order for this to be a piece worth reading. So if you hate a spoiler, you may want to watch the film before reading this.

My spouse and I have been thinking about You Can See Everything since we saw it in theaters a few days ago. It is a very well made, interesting film. My ADHD makes it almost impossible for me to sit through an entire movie, but y’all, I did not move for the entire three hours of this. I have never seen a documentary like it, and at the same time, I feel like it highlights a fundamental truth about all documentaries: we are always being manipulated.

The manipulation is a main character in this film, not only from Elizabeth Holmes and her horrible partner Billy Evans, but from Nathan Fielder (which is a surprise to nobody who has seen his work before), and pretty much everyone else involved in this project. Who is telling the truth? Who is lying? Who is being taken advantage of? The only thing that we can be really sure of after watching the film is that we, the viewer, are being taken for a ride - one that we’ve willingly paid for.

Share

I don’t normally want to watch a film about the trials and tribulations of a wealthy white woman, it is one of my least favorite genres (30-something white man trying to find himself and heal his relationship with his dad via road trip and sex with quirky white women is perhaps my all-time least favorite). But I am a fan of Nathan Fielder, and I must admit to following the Elizabeth Holmes case as it was unfolding, and it just looked so interesting.

And it was interesting, and surprising, and a very good piece of film. And I left with conflicted feelings (which I absolutely believe was the filmmakers’ intent) that I’m still sitting with. And as I’ve thought about this film over the past few days, what has really stood out to me is the overwhelming whiteness of the particular symbiotic abuse of Elizabeth Holmes, Billy Evans, and all of us.

Let me start off by saying this: I wish nothing but awful things for Billy Evans. It has been a long time since I’ve disliked a man so instantly and deeply. He is a manipulative, controlling, narcissistic, misogynist. I want to telepathically send bedbugs to every hotel he ever stays at. I want him to shit himself every time he has a sip of an energy drink.

Watching the film, it becomes clear that Evans set his sights on Holmes because she was mired in controversy, not in spite of it. It is clear that he sees her infamy as his path to fame, wealth and power. It is clear that he has no respect for women - his own partner included. I can bet you money that on some level Evans is thankful for every day that Holmes is in prison, because it’s another day that he gets to literally play her like an online avatar.

And I do not think Holmes should be in prison - not because I do not think she is guilty of the crimes she was accused of - but because I do not think anybody should be in prison. I am sad for her and her children, just as I am sad for all incarcerated people and their loved ones.

But as we watch Fielder’s desperate attempts to let Holmes know how Evans is manipulating her and her image, it becomes very clear that Holmes doesn’t want to know. And her not wanting to know is not born out of a desire to preserve her own image of her partner as some perfect man, but to preserve her own image of herself as the perfect innocent.

Subscribe now

Holmes is a smart woman. Yes, it is clear that she is likely neurodivergent in some way. But she also (and I say this as a neurodivergent woman) wears that neurodivergence as a costume. She both “doesn’t get it” but also knows exactly how to communicate to you how she doesn’t get it. She is clueless but in a way that is so scripted as to leave you with no doubt of how clueless she is. She is vulnerable and lost but in a way that never leaves her for a loss of ways to tell you about how vulnerable and lost she is.

And she’s a woman who was so polished and poised and controlled when she was a “self-made” billionaire, and is now in this film a messy-haired, wide-eyed, sad and confused woman in a rental home by the water. Even the home that this documentary is filmed in feels like part of Holmes’ costume. Just months before filming, she and her small family were living in a multi-million dollar estate in the Bay, but for this time before her incarceration, when they were not only filming this documentary, but also trying to convince judges that they were experiencing extreme financial hardship, she was in a modest, outdated, two bedroom cottage.

When Fielder tries to talk to Holmes about the manipulations of Evans, it is clear that she had no desire to hear it. And she is so confident in that desire. She knows that not knowing is best for her. Just as it was best for her to not know the details of her ex partner’s actions.

I say this without reservation: Holmes is being controlled and manipulated by Evans. But I also say this, with perhaps a little reservation (mostly because it just feels shitty to say): Holmes wants to be controlled and manipulated by Evans, because it allows her to control and manipulate us.

Holmes wants money, power, influence. Holmes wants to cut backroom deals for profits off of the documentary about her and she wants people who portray her in a less-than-favorable light to be punished, and she wants to be the next phenom - and she doesn’t want to be seen wanting it. She doesn’t want to be held responsible for it. She wants it to be done for her and she wants to hide behind the people who are doing it.

And it feels so fucking familiar.

Share

I’ve encountered so many white women like this. White women whose husbands “take care of them” while also harming others. White women who have Black friends and queer friends and their partners get drunk and say slurs and likely voted for Trump but they can never say one way or the other because they “don’t discuss politics”. White women who complain that their order is wrong and then disappear to the bathroom so their partners can yell at the server without them having to witness the awkwardness of it all, and then return to eat their now correct dish.

There is a dual-narcissism to these kinds of relationships. The overt narcissism of the man who needs to look like the most important, smartest, most in-control person in the room, and the quiet narcissism of a woman who needs to be the most innocent, the most faithful, the most oblivious person in the room. And there is a chicken-or-egg question here, to be sure. Was Holmes like this before these men came into her life? Did she seek them out to help them accomplish her goals? Or did these men condition her to be this way? I’ve seen both, and I’ve also seen that it’s often a combination of both.

I think that Holmes absolutely knows who her partner is, and what that allows her to do. And I do think that should she need to in a few years time, if Theranos 2.0 doesn’t work out or if she just needs a way to get back into the spotlight, she will absolutely point to this film and use her emancipation from the villain that is Billy Evans to launch her new brand.

But in the meantime, this man - this narcissistic misogynist- is raising her kids. And that’s what I really can’t stop thinking about. He’s raising her kids with 100% unchallenged control; not only because she is in prison, but because she has given him power of attorney over her life and has seemingly rejected any opportunities for knowledge or empowerment as to what decisions her partner is making. She knows at least to a good degree what type of man her partner is and she has given up any control over how her children are raised by him and one day, when her kids ask her why, she will say - with wide, innocent eyes - that she didn’t know, that perhaps she should have asked more questions, but she was just so trusting, so in love.

And she is trapped now, in so many ways. She is in prison. This man does have her kids. He has control over her life in a way that I wouldn’t wish on anyone. And as frustrated as I am over the way Holmes clings to plausible deniability as to who her partner really is, who her ex partner really was, and how much agency she has had in the harmful things she’s done, I can see why right now why she clings to it. She needs to see her kids. She needs someone to keep her name in the limelight. And when she gets out of prison, she needs someone to be the reason why you don’t know the real her, why it isn’t her fault, why she deserves a second chance.

Share