prodigious reader, chronic forgetter
4491 stories
·
13 followers

Home Is Where Guitarist Joins Portugal. The Man For Victory Academy Benefit

1 Comment

The rootsy, passionate Florida emo crew Home Is Where were a Stereogum Band To Watch in 2021. Last year, they came back with their album Hunting Season. Over the weekend, guitarist Tilley Komorny tweeted a surprising update: "been a while since i’ve been on here but im playing guitar in Portugal. The Man now lol."

The post Home Is Where Guitarist Joins Portugal. The Man For Victory Academy Benefit appeared first on Stereogum.



Read the whole story
rocketo
3 hours ago
reply
wtf is this headline
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete

The Killers

1 Share

The killers of Alex Pretti have been identified and, depressingly, they are both Latino men.

The two federal immigration agents who fired on Minneapolis protester Alex Pretti are identified in government records as Border Patrol agent Jesus Ochoa and Customs and Border Protection officer Raymundo Gutierrez.

The records viewed by ProPublica list Ochoa, 43, and Gutierrez, 35, as the shooters during the deadly encounter last weekend that left Pretti dead and ignited massive protests and calls for criminal investigations.

Both men were assigned to Operation Metro Surge, an immigration enforcement dragnet launched in December that sent scores of armed and masked agents across the city.

Ochoa is a Border Patrol agent who joined CBP in 2018. Gutierrez joined in 2014 and works for CBP’s Office of Field Operations. He is assigned to a special response team, which conducts high-risk operations like those of police SWAT units. Records show both men are from South Texas.

Ochoa, who goes by Jesse, graduated from the University of Texas-Pan American with a degree in criminal justice, according to his ex-wife, Angelica Ochoa. A longtime resident of the Rio Grande Valley, Ochoa had for years dreamed of working for the Border Patrol and finally landed a job there, she said. By the time the couple split in 2021, he had become a gun enthusiast with about 25 rifles, pistols and shotguns, Angelica Ochoa said.

It’s easy to say that the colonized now wants to be the colonizer and I suppose there’s some truth in that. What’s probably more accurate here is that, at least in the case of Ochoa, you have a right-wing gun nut empowered to kill who likes it. The Border Patrol has also long been a major job creator in south Texas. Combine that with the homophobia and misogyny at the heart of the MAGA movement and the belief that “we did it the right way when grandma immigrated” myths and you create a situation where men like this volunteer to act out their fantasies.

But, as the right-wing Cubans being deported in Florida are discovering, a Latino is never going to be accepted as white, no matter how hard you try.

The post The Killers appeared first on Lawyers, Guns & Money.

Read the whole story
rocketo
4 hours ago
reply
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete

The Roosevelt Administration Is A Warning

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Many who are resisting authoritarianism are over-relying on the Democratic Party and Democratic elected leaders to save us. This is a very big mistake. The story of how the Franklin Delano Roosevelt administration, often lauded for its role in rescuing in the U.S. economy, fighting a war against fascism in Europe, and building a long-term base for Democratic politics, behaved in the face of authoritarian threats exposes how even “good guys” fighting “real fascism” can become complicit in authoritarianism when they prioritize coalition maintenance and Party survival over universal rights, and therefore treat governance in the face of authoritarian threats as normal politics.

Democratic Party leadership, even those fighting authoritarianism, should be assumed to be vulnerable to sacrificing marginalized communities when it serves their coalition-building strategy. In order to build a coalition for “democratic” politics, the Franklin Delano Roosevelt administration built robust democratic infrastructure (unions, social security, public works) for white workers while:

  • Abandoning anti-lynching legislation to keep Southern Democrats in the fold

  • Excluding domestic and agricultural workers (majority Black) from New Deal protections, again, to keep white Democrats in the coalition

  • Destroying Native communities through dams and displacement

  • Incarcerating 120,000 Japanese Americans while fighting fascism

  • Restricting immigration of Jewish refugees until genocide was a fait accompli, and, even then, never actually welcoming Jewish refugees even after the war

The pattern: Progressive governance for some, authoritarian violence for others, all justified as political necessity. And, what these failures did keep the avenues open for a post-WWII rise of authoritarianism in the U.S.

Democrats right now are likely to:

1. Choose “winnable” fights over existential ones

  • Negotiate infrastructure bills while authoritarian consolidation accelerates

  • Focus on 2026 messaging rather than immediate disruption in order to prevent consolidation

  • Treat this as a bad political cycle, not as anti-democratic regime change

2. Horse-trading vulnerable communities by “accepting” the following:

  • “We can’t protect trans kids AND win moderates”

  • We must abandon undocumented immigrants to look “tough on border security”

  • Sacrifice voting rights to preserve the filibuster

  • Soft-pedal on civil resistance because it polls badly

3. Mistaking partisan politics for anti-authoritarian resistance

  • Believing institutional norms and electoral strategy will save us when the historical evidence proves this completely wrong

  • Asking people to “vote harder” when the game has fundamentally changed

  • Treating mass civil disobedience as a radical position rather than as a necessary survival strategy

4. Measuring success by what Democrats gain rather than what authoritarianism loses

  • Celebrating legislative wins while ignoring pillars of authoritarian support going unchallenged

  • Focusing on 2028 candidate positioning while regulatory capture proceeds

  • Building party infrastructure instead of mass noncooperation capacity

The key difference you’re naming: Authoritarianism requires mass, sustained, disruptive, and sometimes illegal action - tactics that partisan actors structurally cannot lead.

Democrats will always be constrained by:

  • Electoral viability calculations

  • Donor relationships

  • Institutional position (can’t call for breaking laws they’re sworn to uphold)

  • Media narratives about “responsible” opposition

  • Coalition management that sacrifices some for others

But defeating authoritarianism requires:

  • Sustained noncooperation that disrupts economic/social functioning

  • Mass civil disobedience that accepts legal consequences

  • Offensive disruption of authoritarian consolidation, not defensive protest

  • Unity across ideological lines that transcends party loyalty

  • Willingness to sacrifice “normalcy” and comfort for sustained resistance

  • Nonpartisanship, which is often viewed as against Party interests

This history argues that anti-authoritarian resistance must be led by civil society, not party infrastructure, because:

  1. Only civil society can mobilize disruptive action at scale - parties need to maintain legitimacy; movements can risk it

  2. Only nonpartisan coalitions can achieve the mass required - achieving critical mass requires reaching beyond partisan bases

  3. Only those outside institutional power can name the game has changed - Democrats will keep playing by rules that no longer exist

  4. Only movements can refuse the horse-trading - parties will always sacrifice some communities; movements must hold the line for everyone

  5. Only civil resistance can disrupt fast enough - legislative strategy operates on electoral timelines; authoritarianism consolidates daily

The warning translates to specific choices ahead:

  • When Democrats propose “bipartisan election reform” that abandons key protections - will movements accept it or escalate disruption?

  • When party leadership says mass walkouts will “hurt our chances in 2026” - will organizers defer or act anyway?

  • When protecting one marginalized community requires “compromise” on another - will civil society hold firm for universal protection?

  • When sustained noncooperation threatens economic stability - will resistance accept that cost or return to normal?

FDR built a powerful state apparatus and democratic infrastructure for white America while enabling authoritarianism against everyone else. The “good” politics and the authoritarian politics weren’t in tension - they were the same political project, with different populations experiencing different faces of state power.

Today’s Democrats could build climate infrastructure while abandoning immigrants, protect abortion while sacrificing trans people, strengthen unions while enabling police militarization - all while genuinely believing they’re fighting authoritarianism. But all of these moves destroy a fundamental pillar of democracy - pluralism. For those of us who want to live in a free country, pluralism matters greatly - it is the operative theory behind the famous quote by Dr. King, that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

The only check on this kind of backsliding is a movement that refuses those trades, operates outside partisan constraints, and recognizes that mass civil resistance isn’t one tactic among many - it’s the difference between resisting authoritarianism and managing your position under it.

Read the whole story
rocketo
10 hours ago
reply
"The pattern: Progressive governance for some, authoritarian violence for others, all justified as political necessity. And, what these failures did keep the avenues open for a post-WWII rise of authoritarianism in the U.S."
seattle, wa
angelchrys
8 hours ago
reply
Overland Park, KS
Share this story
Delete

screenshotsofdespair:

1 Comment

screenshotsofdespair:

Read the whole story
rocketo
20 hours ago
reply
i laugh every time i see this
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete

Annapurna Sriram Wrote the Slutty, Liberated Brown Girl Ingenue She Wanted To Play Herself

1 Share
Read the whole story
rocketo
1 day ago
reply
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete

Timothée Chalamet Could Only ‘Wigga’ Out for So Long

1 Comment
On January 22 the Oscar nominations were announced and, as most bet, Timothée Chalamet made the Best Actor list for his performance in More »
Read the whole story
rocketo
2 days ago
reply
"His ability to weaponize a fine-tuned silliness at no cost to prestige reflects an industry where white actors enjoy greater freedom in promotion and self-expression."
seattle, wa
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories